Article "Siège de Mantes" in French Wikipedia has 25.3 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 13 references and 8 sections.
Since the creation of article "Siège de Mantes", its content was written by 17 registered users of French Wikipedia and edited by 17 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 309 times in French Wikipedia and cited 309 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | French: #304933 04.2021 |
Global: #2895396 04.2021 |
| Best Rank | French: #54014 11.2014 |
Global: #680321 11.2014 |
On 28 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Fallout, Facebook, Baby Reindeer, Challengers, Premier League, Fallout, deaths in 2024, Queen of Tears, Arsenal F.C..
In French Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Doully, Jean-Pierre Ferland, Cookie (informatique), François Sureau, L'Année du dragon, Les Animaux fantastiques : Les Secrets de Dumbledore, Le Grand Pardon, Omar Sy, Mickey Rourke, Les Animaux fantastiques (film).
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(10.91+6.88+15.79+30.77+62.06)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
